Made with Mozilla Composer


At this point in time, this is only an index page corresponding to a URL.

You may wish to see some of the material I have begun posting about
  space and related sectors of Japan, 
a general logpage (currently re-thinking it), and
the general subject of architecture
at this URL below:

bulentsayin.site.voila.fr


I shall delete the contents below if I feel they are keeping me from making money or otherwise causing me trouble:

October  1st, 2005

The central objective of left wing policies is to expand equal rights for all and reduce privilege. Any policy that seeks to reserve or expand privilege or diminish equal rights for all is therefore a right wing policy. Right wing policies justify themselves on productivity increase. Left wing policies justify themselves on equity, however, they must rely on productivity increase in order to promote equity in deed and significantly and on a sustainable basis. Due to imperfections in human society, at least for the time being, left wing policies and right wing policies must serve like two legs, by which the society would walk the route of progress: left, right, left, right.... However, once in a while, as productivity level reaches a  major milestone, or threshold,  it is time for revolution; this is how the Industrial Revolution and replacement of feudal order by capitalist order - or, to use a more general term of my own, *order of industrialization / urbanization*, came about. But productivity has continued to go up ever since (and productivity really has nowhere to go but up, unless interrupted by war or other catastrophe) and it might very well be the time now for another revolution....


September 30, 2005

The leftists, especially in developed countries should push for the following:

1- Mandatory higher education in arts and sciences -- this is a key factor, a highly educated population is a must to build a system that can replace capitalism; it is above all a matter of culture (the Russians failed building the requisite culture, obviously, and there must be lessons there). The new culture would have to support, among other things,  ways to replace bureaucrats by computers and elected councils and a switch from representative democracy to direct democracy.

2- Automation and higher productivity all the time, this too, is a key factor; abundance would be a key attribute of the new system (remember how they define economics on the basis of scarce resources, and remember that German social democracy or American New Deal -- they now need a *New-New-Deal*! --  would simply not be possible without high productivity, like only one percent of the population producing enough foodstuff to feed the entire nation).

3- Revise intellectual property rights, for example, legalize reverse engineering, this supports item number 2 above on productivity. Pay attention, support, and further develop new forms of ownership and business models, such  Open Source Software -- some people are now trying to apply this to pharmaceutical sector, for example. Do spend public funds in R&D and get all governments to do the same, thus both getting every body on equal footing and contributing to overall productivity objective.

4- Make capital outflows, not inflows, a bit expensive -- yes, tax'em!/:-) The scheme as proposed by what's-his-name-I-forgot is too coarse, crude, taxing both inflows and outflows. Only outflows should be taxed by a national government (which would  certainly be equitable) and then the proceeds thereof could of course be used to finance schemes for encouraging  domestic investment, including foreign capital inflow for direct investment. Thus, for a given unit of capital moving across borders, taxation on exit would be at least in part offset by  the investment promotion in the  target country for investment.  And I think  this would, in addition to being equitable, also be efficient, for it would likely reduce rate of failed investment operations. 

5- Oppose wars that are designed to defer collapse of capitalism and to shift wealth from high productivity sectors to low productivity sectors and to "kill the beast (the beast here is budget surplus and so money for social spending)" inside one's country --  and not really necessary to protect any vital national interests, what a big lie! -- Iraq war, for example.

6- Redefine and strengthen the family through primarily redefining and strengthening status of women -- and I'd start with Catholic understanding of marriage. I feel the family would play a key role in building the new culture. Alongside this, keep or bring back conscription. People, normal people, civilian people, fathers and mothers and sons and daughters, willing and able to provide for their own national security is I think also essential for the new culture and also for avoiding unjust wars and defending the new regime.

7- Meanwhile promote selected processes worldwide, including German tripartite process and at the same time promote new Anglo-American *inventions* centered around "shareholder activism", including "socially responsible investment" (yes, yes, including the eco stuff, the Green stuff -- the Greens need to understand that it would take the greater socio-economic and political-military agenda like this ten-item agenda here to really implement a truly Green agenda).

8- Always support higher taxes and better social safety net.

9- The biggest issue would be to separate capital ownership from entrepreneurship; shift to collective capital ownership while keeping private entrepreneurship, but at the same time raise an entirely new breed of entrepreneurs motivated by factors other than selfish material interest, motivation that would allow them work with collectively owned capital and also achieve higher productivity than capitalist, selfish-interest-based system. Principles should regulate the markets, not the other way around. (Capitalists, of course, want it that money regulate both the markets AND the principles!)

10- Remember; the new system would have to achieve higher productivity levels than capitalist system; and then turn that productivity advantage to military superiority. Without this military and security outcome, the capitalists will not allow any new system to survive.

Simple, no? :-)